Surgical treatment of adolescent gynaecomastia improves quality of life
Surgical treatment of gynaecomastia in adolescents improves quality of life (QoL), as well as physical and psychosocial functioning, a recent study has shown.
Through surveys administered to adolescents with gynaecomastia (n=44; mean age 16.5±1.9 years) and male controls (n=64; mean age 15.9±2.3 years), researchers measured participant QoL. The Short-From 36 (SF-36) version 2, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) surveys were employed postoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years of follow-up.
At baseline, patients had significantly lower scores than controls in the SF-36 domains of general health (p<0.001), vitality (p<0.001), social functioning (p<0.001), role-emotional (p=0.008), mental health (p=0.002) and RSES (p<0.001), and higher scores in the EAT-26 survey (p<0.001).
At the 6-month follow-up, only scores in the bodily pain (p=0.04) and general health (p=0.02) SF-36 domains, as well as in the RSES (p=0.003) and EAT-26 (p<0.001) surveys were significantly different between patients and controls. By 5 years, only EAT-26 scores were significantly different (p=0.02).
Gynaecomastia patients showed significant improvements in five SF-36 domains after surgery (physical functioning: difference, 10.8; p=0.002; role-physical: difference, 8.5; p=0.009; bodily pain: difference, 7.4; p=0.01; general health: difference, 5.2; p=0.04; social functioning: difference, 17.7; p=0.001).
In comparison, the preoperative-to-postoperative change in RSES score only approached significance (difference, 2.0; p=0.05), while EAT-26 scores did not significantly change (difference, –0.3; p=0.79).
Controls did not show significant changes in any of the survey scores from baseline to follow-up (p>0.05 for all).