Brensocatib tackles exacerbations in bronchiectasis

Roshini Claire Anthony
22 Sep 2020
Brensocatib tackles exacerbations in bronchiectasis

Treatment with the DPP 1* inhibitor brensocatib prolonged time to exacerbation and reduced exacerbation rates in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, according to the phase II WILLOW** study presented at ERS 2020.

The 256 participants (mean age 64.1 years) with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily doses of brensocatib 10 mg, 25 mg, or placebo for 24 weeks.

Twenty-five percent of patients had asthma, 16.4 percent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 35.9 percent were hospitalized for exacerbations within the past 2 years. At baseline, mean FEV1 percent predicted was 67.8 percent, 34.8 percent of patients had Pseudomonas (P.) aeruginosa in their sputum, and 15.6 percent were on chronic macrolide therapy.

At 24 weeks, fewer brensocatib 10 and 25 mg recipients experienced a bronchiectasis exacerbation compared with placebo recipients (31.7 percent and 33.3 percent vs 48.3 percent; p=0.033 [10 mg] and p=0.038 [25 mg] vs placebo). [ERS 2020, presentation Nr 4135]

Time to first episode of bronchiectasis exacerbation over 24 weeks was significantly longer among brensocatib compared with placebo recipients, be it brensocatib 10 mg (p=0.027) or 25 mg (p=0.044), with a reduced risk of exacerbation in both groups vs placebo (hazard ratio [HR]stratified, 0.58, 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.35–0.95; p=0.029 [10 mg] and HRstratified, 0.62, 95 percent CI, 0.38–0.99; p=0.046 [25 mg]).

The findings were consistent across multiple subgroups including age, baseline FEV1 percent predicted, geographic region, number or previous hospitalization for exacerbations, use of macrolides at baseline, and presence of P. aeruginosa.

“Although the CIs change because of the sizes of the subgroups, all of the effect estimates are below 1, suggesting that the benefit of [brensocatib] vs placebo was observed similarly across all subgroups,” noted study investigator Professor James Chalmers from the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.

Rate of exacerbations over 24 weeks was also significantly reduced with brensocatib 10 mg (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.64, 95 percent CI, 0.42–0.98; p=0.041) though not with brensocatib 25 mg (IRR, 0.75, 95 percent CI, 0.50–1.13; p=0.167) vs placebo. These findings were also consistent across most subgroups.

Exacerbations leading to hospitalization occurred more frequently in placebo (11.5 percent) than brensocatib 10 mg (6.1 percent) or 25 mg (4.6 percent) recipients, with exacerbation as the primary cause of hospitalization in 8.0, 6.1, and 4.6 percent of placebo, brensocatib 10 mg, and 25 mg recipients, respectively.

Brensocatib also reduced sputum neutrophil elastase, proteinase 3, and cathepsin G activity during the on-treatment period. There was an appearance of a dose-response relationship, with greater reductions noted in the 25 mg group, said Chalmers. These results suggest that the reduction in exacerbations may be driven by the reduction in inflammation.

Excluding exacerbations, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred more often in brensocatib (63.0 percent [10 mg] and 53.9 percent [25 mg]) than placebo recipients (37.6 percent).

The most commonly occurring (10 percent) TEAEs in brensocatib recipients were cough, headache, increased sputum, and dyspnoea. Dental and skin AEs occurred more frequently in brensocatib 10 and 25 mg than placebo recipients (dental: 16.0 percent and 10.1 percent vs 3.5 percent; skin: 14.8 percent and 23.6 percent vs 11.8 percent). Infection rates were comparable between placebo, brensocatib 10 mg or 25 mg recipients (17.6, 13.6, and 16.9 percent, respectively), as was 2 mm increase in periodontal pocket depth and 5 mm absolute depth (11.6, 11.3, and 12.3 percent, respectively).

Serious TEAEs occurred in more placebo (22.4 percent) than brensocatib 10 mg or 25 mg recipients (13.6 percent and 11.2 percent, respectively). The one death in the brensocatib 25 mg arm was determined as bronchiectasis progression- and not treatment-related.


A new treatment for bronchiectasis?

“Brensocatib consistently prolonged time to first exacerbation and reduced rates of exacerbation both in the primary analysis and across a number of patient subgroups analysed, particularly those defined by disease severity, P. aeruginosa infection, and sputum neutrophil elastase concentration,” said Chalmers.

“[The significant reduction in sputum NSP*** concentrations] highlights the importance of treating neutrophil-mediated inflammation in patients with bronchiectasis,” he added.

As this was a phase II study, larger, longer-term studies are required to establish these findings and determine the risk-benefit profile of brensocatib for bronchiectasis. “[Nonetheless,] these are encouraging results for a new approach to treating bronchiectasis,” he concluded.



Editor's Recommendations
Related Diseases