Most Read Articles
Pearl Toh, 07 Aug 2018
A home-based, self-applied wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) patch facilitates diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) among high-risk individuals, according to the mSToPS* trial.
Roshini Claire Anthony, 3 days ago

A genotype-guided approach to warfarin dosing may result in fewer dose adjustments in Asian patients, according to a study from Singapore.

6 days ago

Fungal microbiome, also called the mycobiome, appears to be highly variable in patients with well-characterized fungal diseases, a recent study has shown. Moreover, severe asthmatics have the highest fungal loads, along with those receiving steroid and antifungal therapy.

Tristan Manalac, 4 days ago
The risk of complicated appendicitis is lower in children with IgE-mediated allergy, according to a recent study.

Battle of microperimeters: CenterVue MAIA vs Nidek MP-3

10 Jan 2018

Values generated by the CenterVue Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) vs the Nidek Microperimetry-3 (MP-3) microperimeter are higher for retinal sensitivity but lower for luminance and contrast sensitivity, suggests a recent study.

However, the relationships appear fairly consistent, and application of a standard correction factor allows data to be inter-related, at least for normal eyes, according to the investigators.

The mean retinal sensitivity measures were significantly lower (p<0.0001) with the MP-3 (25.02±1.06 dB; range, 20.90–26.70) compared with the MAIA (30.68±0.74 dB; range, 28–31.84). The luminosity levels measured by the MP-3 (7.75±1.31 asb; range, 6.44–9.06) were significantly higher (p<0.0001) vs those of the MAIA (0.92±0.14 asb; range, 0.78–1.06). The MP-3 (0.94±0.33 log units; range, 0.61–1.27) also measured significantly higher contrast sensitivity compared with the MAIA (0.23±0.03 log units; range, 0.20–0.26).

The intraclass coefficient between the two instruments, despite the absolute differences, was 0.85 (95 percent CI, 0.70‒0.92) after applying a standard correction factor to each data point (MAIA sensitivity=MP-3 sensitivity+5.65), with a mean difference of 0.01 between MP-3 and MAIA.

The investigators conducted a prospective comparative study on 31 eyes of 23 healthy participants who underwent complete ophthalmological examination including retinal sensitivity assessments using two microperimeters: the MP-3 by Nidek Technologies and the MAIA by CenterVue. They analysed the mean retinal sensitivity as well as its corresponding luminance and contrast between the two devices. Interdevice reproducibility and level of agreement between the sensitivity values of the devices were also evaluated.

Digital Edition
Asia's trusted medical magazine for healthcare professionals. Get your MIMS Doctor - Malaysia digital copy today!
Sign In To Download
Editor's Recommendations
Most Read Articles
Pearl Toh, 07 Aug 2018
A home-based, self-applied wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) patch facilitates diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) among high-risk individuals, according to the mSToPS* trial.
Roshini Claire Anthony, 3 days ago

A genotype-guided approach to warfarin dosing may result in fewer dose adjustments in Asian patients, according to a study from Singapore.

6 days ago

Fungal microbiome, also called the mycobiome, appears to be highly variable in patients with well-characterized fungal diseases, a recent study has shown. Moreover, severe asthmatics have the highest fungal loads, along with those receiving steroid and antifungal therapy.

Tristan Manalac, 4 days ago
The risk of complicated appendicitis is lower in children with IgE-mediated allergy, according to a recent study.